Our Insights

Rethinking Psychological Safety: A Strategic Imperative for Resilient, High-Growth Organizations

For too long, psychological safety has been relegated to the category of “soft skills”, a well-meaning but ultimately optional aspect of workplace culture. In reality, it is one of the most critical strategic assets an organization can invest in. Especially in times of disruption, transformation, and complexity, psychological safety is not just about creating a more “nice” or “supportive” workplace; it is about building the conditions for resilience, innovation, risk management, and sustained business growth.

This blog post goes beyond the basics to explore the research behind psychological safety, the business case for prioritizing it, and how organizations can embed it as a core part of their leadership and culture strategy.

What Is Psychological Safety?

Psychological safety, as defined by Harvard Business School professor Amy Edmondson, is “a shared belief held by members of a team that the team is safe for interpersonal risk-taking.” It means people feel safe to speak up, disagree, ask questions, or admit mistakes without fear of humiliation or retaliation.

It’s not about being nice, avoiding conflict, or creating echo chambers. In fact, high levels of psychological safety often surface more dissent, deeper learning, and more rigorous debate, not less. What distinguishes psychologically safe teams is their ability to navigate these moments constructively.

The Strategic Value of Psychological Safety

In her seminal 1999 study of hospital teams, Edmondson found that teams with higher psychological safety reported more errors. This is not because they made more, but because they felt safer reporting them. This insight sparked decades of research confirming the same pattern across industries: when people feel safe to speak up, organizations learn faster, adapt quicker, and innovate more effectively.

Google’s massive internal research project, Project Aristotle, which studied over 180 teams, identified psychological safety as the single most important factor in high-performing teams. It was more predictive than team composition, tenure, or even individual intelligence.

So why does psychological safety matter for business strategy?

1. It fuels innovation.

Organizations that want to stay competitive must reward experimentation, dissent, and creativity. Without psychological safety, employees will not take the interpersonal risks required to offer new ideas, challenge assumptions, or test new approaches.

2. It strengthens adaptability and resilience.

In complex systems, whether in healthcare, tech, finance, or public service, the ability to surface errors early and course-correct quickly is essential. Psychological safety enables early warning signals, continuous learning, and frontline problem-solving.

3. 3. It enhances performance and engagement.

Gallup research shows that employee engagement is tightly linked to whether individuals feel their voice matters. When people feel safe to contribute fully, they bring more energy, discretionary effort, and accountability to their work.

4. It mitigates risk and protects reputation.

When psychological safety is low, issues are hidden. Risks are buried. Employees watch leadership make poor decisions without speaking up. In highly regulated sectors, such as aviation, energy, healthcare, and financial services, this can be catastrophic. But even in less regulated environments, the risk to brand, customer trust, and internal morale is significant.

5. It builds inclusive, equitable workplaces.

Psychological safety is foundational to inclusion. Without it, diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts cannot succeed. It is disproportionately impactful for those from underrepresented or equity-deserving groups, who may already experience elevated interpersonal risk in organizational systems.

Psychological Safety Isn’t One-Dimensional

It’s tempting to reduce psychological safety to a binary: either it exists, or it doesn’t. But in reality, psychological safety shows up at multiple levels within organizations. Drawing from Edmondson’s foundational work and contemporary organizational practice, we can think about psychological safety in three nested layers:

1. Individual Level

Do I feel safe speaking up in this room, with this team, about this issue? Psychological safety is highly contextual. An individual might feel safe contributing ideas in one meeting but stay silent in another, depending on the power dynamics, psychological threats, or subject matter.

2. Team Level

Amy Edmondson’s research emphasizes the team as the core unit of analysis. Teams are where interpersonal risk-taking occurs, such as giving feedback, admitting mistakes, and challenging decisions. The behaviour of leaders, the group’s norms, and peer interactions all shape whether a team cultivates or suppresses psychological safety.

3. Organizational Level

Even highly skilled leaders can’t sustain psychological safety if the broader organizational systems work against it. Performance management practices, communication norms, hierarchy, and reward structures all influence whether people feel safe to take risks. If candour is punished, or failure is stigmatized, safety will erode, regardless of individual leaders’ intentions.

Within and across these layers, different types of psychological safety show up in distinct but interconnected ways, each essential to unlocking full participation, learning, and performance.

Types of Psychological Safety

In their 2021 paper, Newman, Donohue, and Eva identify four dimensions of psychological safety that can deepen how we understand and build it:

1. Learner Safety – Feeling safe to ask questions, experiment, and make mistakes without fear of embarrassment.
2. Contributor Safety – Feeling safe to offer ideas and make meaningful contributions to the team.
3. Challenger Safety – Feeling safe to question the status quo, raise concerns, and offer dissenting views.
4. Inclusion Safety – Feeling safe to be one’s authentic self without fear of being marginalized or excluded.

These dimensions build upon one another. Without inclusion safety, people won’t feel grounded enough to learn, contribute, or challenge. Without challenger safety, innovation and accountability suffer. Senior leaders must invest in building all four and ensure they’re present across all layers of the organization.

The Cost of Neglect

When psychological safety is absent, the consequences ripple across the organization. Talent attrition and disengagement rise as employees feel undervalued or unheard. Innovation slows to a halt, with teams avoiding risk and withholding ideas. Unaddressed risks fester, exposing the organization to potential reputational, legal, and compliance fallout. Efforts to drive equity and inclusion fall flat when employees, especially those from underrepresented groups, do not feel safe to speak up or show up fully. At its core, a lack of psychological safety creates a culture of silence. And when people are afraid to tell the truth, organizations cannot grow.

Embedding Psychological Safety Strategically

It’s time to stop treating psychological safety as a culture “nice-to-have” and start treating it as a leadership and performance capability. Here’s how senior leaders can start:

1. Anchor It to Business Strategy

Tie psychological safety directly to your strategic goals, whether it’s innovation, growth, talent retention, or digital transformation. Make the case in language the executive team understands: performance, risk mitigation, growth.

2. Equip Leaders at All Levels

Psychological safety starts with leadership behaviour. Train leaders on how to:

• Model vulnerability (e.g., admit mistakes)
• Respond appreciatively to input
• Encourage dissent and debate
• Use inclusive meeting practices
• Frame failure as learning

3. Audit Systems, Not Just Behaviors

Examine how your organizational systems (e.g., performance management, communication, promotions) either foster or suppress voice. Are people rewarded for candour? Are failures debriefed constructively?

4. Integrate with Inclusion and Equity Work

Don’t separate psychological safety from DEI. Safety without equity can reinforce power and comfort for the dominant group. Ensure your efforts centre on lived experience and account for identity-based risks.

5. Measure It, But Meaningfully

Use tools like Edmondson’s Team Psychological Safety Scale to assess how safe your teams feel. Pair quantitative data with qualitative insights. Pay attention to whose voices are missing or muted.

Psychological safety isn’t about avoiding discomfort; it’s about creating the conditions for constructive discomfort, where people are stretched, challenged, and empowered to speak the truth. Organizations that get this right will outlearn, out-innovate, and outlast those that don’t.

It’s time we stop calling psychological safety a “soft skill.” It’s a strategic advantage and it’s one your organization can’t afford to ignore.